Participation in the DPF (Data Privacy Framework)

Feature Requests
1

Probably for EU cloud users a thing. Transmission of personal data from the EU would be much easier in the commercial context.

1 Like
2

Hi @t.s.123.teable,

Thanks for raising this. We understand why DPF participation matters for EU users, especially in commercial scenarios involving personal data, as it can make data transfer and compliance handling easier.

DPF is already on our radar, and it is something we would like to support in the future. However, we do not have a confirmed timeline at the moment. The related compliance work requires legal, operational, and engineering resources, so we cannot commit to a specific completion date right now.

For now, if DPF participation is a requirement for your use case, self-hosted deployment may be the better option, as it gives you direct control over your infrastructure and data environment.

We will continue to track this request and consider it as part of our longer-term compliance planning.

1 Like
3

Do you know if it can be completed until February 2026? Do you currently offer SCCs instead?

4

Hi @t.s.123.teable,

Thanks for following up. I understand you need clarity for planning ahead.

At this point, we can’t commit to DPF participation by February 2027, and we don’t currently offer SCCs for Teable Cloud.

We do recognize that this matters for EU commercial use cases. It remains on our longer-term compliance radar, but our team is currently focused on product development, so we don’t have a timeline to share.

If this is a requirement you need to meet now, self-hosting may be the more practical option. With a self-hosted deployment, Teable runs in your own infrastructure, and your data does not need to be hosted or processed through Teable Cloud.